m |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*A site geotechnical analysis similar to [[Karst|karst]] is recommended. | *A site geotechnical analysis similar to [[Karst|karst]] is recommended. | ||
*Where [[Glossary#I|infiltration]] is used, [[Glossary#B|Best Management Practice]] (BMP) depths will be limited. In fact, infiltration may be altogether infeasible at the site if a minimum 3 foot separation between the bottom of the practice and bedrock cannot be achieved. | *Where [[Glossary#I|infiltration]] is used, [[Glossary#B|Best Management Practice]] (BMP) depths will be limited. In fact, infiltration may be altogether infeasible at the site if a minimum 3 foot separation between the bottom of the practice and bedrock cannot be achieved. | ||
− | *Design specifications for allowable ponding depths (e.g., live storage) in filters, swales, and bioretention should be considered to up to 12 inches (typical allowable depths range from | + | *Design specifications for allowable ponding depths (e.g., live storage) in filters, swales, and bioretention should be considered to up to 12 inches (typical allowable depths range from 6 to 9 inches). This will help reduce the required surface area of these facilities. |
*Underground practices such as filters will be possible but very expensive if blasting required. | *Underground practices such as filters will be possible but very expensive if blasting required. | ||
− | *Potential | + | *[[Potential stormwater hotspot]] (PSH) infiltration may not be desirable due to potential for connections with bedrock fracture zones. |
− | *Stormwater wetlands will have greater potential than ponds for larger storage facilities due to limitation on ponding depths. However, this means larger surface area to drainage area ratios will be required. | + | *[[Stormwater wetlands]] will have greater potential than [[Stormwater ponds|ponds]] for larger storage facilities due to limitation on ponding depths. However, this means larger surface area to drainage area ratios will be required. |
− | *Engineered soil compost amendments may be required where soils are less than | + | *Engineered soil [[Turf|compost amendments]] may be required where soils are less than 3 feet deep to be eligible for certain stormwater credits. |
− | + | The following table provides an overview of shallow bedrock and soil related design considerations for different structural practice groups. | |
{{:BMP use in settings with shallow soils and shallow depth to bedrock}} | {{:BMP use in settings with shallow soils and shallow depth to bedrock}} |
Bedrock and shallow soils are found in many portions of the state, but are a particular problem in the northeastern region of the state. Sites with shallow bedrock are defined for the purpose of this paper as bedrock within 6 feet or less of the ground surface. The stormwater management implications of shallow bedrock affect infiltration, ponding depths, and the use of underground practices. These sites present a host of challenges to the design engineer. However, these challenges can be managed and designed. Similar to karst, there are general guidelines to consider when designing stormwater management practices in these areas, as presented below. Special caution for steep slopes and hidden bedrock fractures is urged.
The following table provides an overview of shallow bedrock and soil related design considerations for different structural practice groups.
Recommendations for structural BMP use in settings with shallow soils and shallow depth to bedrock.
Link to this table
BMP | Shallow soil and shallow depth to bedrock considerations |
---|---|
Bioretention | Should be constructed with an underdrain or liner if minimum separation distance of three (3) feet is not present between practice bottom and bedrock.1 |
Media filter |
|
Vegetative filter |
|
Infiltration trench or basin |
|
Stormwater ponds |
|
Constructed wetlands |
|
1A liner is required under the Construction Stormwater General Permit.
Geotechnical investigations are recommended for all proposed stormwater facilities located in regions with shallow bedrock and soils. The recommended approach is similar to those for karst areas. The purpose of the investigation is to identify subsurface conditions which could pose an environmental concern or a construction hazard to a proposed stormwater management practice. The guidelines outlined below should not be interpreted as all-inclusive. The design of any subsurface investigation should reflect the size and complexity of the proposed project.
The investigation should determine the nature and thickness of subsurface materials, including depth to bedrock and to the water table. Subsurface data may be acquired by backhoe excavation and/or soil boring. These field data should be supplemented by geophysical investigation techniques deemed appropriate by a qualified professional, which will show the location of bedrock formations under the surface. The data listed below should be acquired under the direct supervision of a qualified geologist, geotechnical engineer, or soil scientist who is experienced in conducting such studies. Pertinent site information shall be collected which should include the following:
Borings should be located in order to provide representative area coverage of the proposed BMP facilities. The location of borings should be:
The numbers of recommended borings are:
Borings should be extended to a minimum depth of five feet below the lowest proposed grade within the practice unless auger/backhoe refusal is encountered.
All material penetrated by the boring should be identified, as follows:
At least one subsurface cross section through the proposed practice should be provided, showing confining layers, depth to bedrock, and water table (if encountered). It should extend through a central portion of the proposed practice, using the actual or projected boring data. A sketch map or formal construction plan indicating the location and dimension of the proposed practice and line of cross section should be included for reference, or as a base map for presentation of subsurface data.