m |
|||
(14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [[File:Technical information page image.png|100px|left|alt=image]] | ||
The following terminology is used throughout this design section: | The following terminology is used throughout this design section: | ||
{{Alert|''REQUIRED'' - Indicates design standards stipulated by the [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_stormwater_permit MPCA Construction General Permit] (CGP)(or other consistently applicable regulations)|alert-danger}} | {{Alert|''REQUIRED'' - Indicates design standards stipulated by the [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_stormwater_permit MPCA Construction General Permit] (CGP)(or other consistently applicable regulations)|alert-danger}} | ||
Line 5: | Line 6: | ||
''RECOMMENDED'' - Indicates design guidance that is helpful for filtration practice performance but not critical to the design. | ''RECOMMENDED'' - Indicates design guidance that is helpful for filtration practice performance but not critical to the design. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Design phase maintenance considerations== | ||
+ | {{alert|Maintenance considerations are an important component of design|alert-warning}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | Implicit in the design guidance is the fact that many design elements of infiltration and filtration systems can minimize the maintenance burden and maintain pollutant removal efficiency. Key examples include | ||
+ | *limiting drainage area; | ||
+ | *providing easy site access (''REQUIRED''); | ||
+ | *providing [[Glossary#P|pretreatment]] (''REQUIRED''); and | ||
+ | *utilizing native plantings (see [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Minnesota_plant_lists Plants for Stormwater Design]). | ||
+ | |||
+ | For more information on design information for individual infiltration and filtration practices, [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Category:Design_criteria link here]. | ||
==Major design elements== | ==Major design elements== | ||
===Physical feasibility initial check=== | ===Physical feasibility initial check=== | ||
Before deciding to use a [[Glossary#F|filtration]] device for stormwater management, it is helpful to consider several items that bear on the feasibility of using such a device at a given location. The following list of considerations will help in making an initial judgment as to whether or not a filtration device is the appropriate BMP for the site. | Before deciding to use a [[Glossary#F|filtration]] device for stormwater management, it is helpful to consider several items that bear on the feasibility of using such a device at a given location. The following list of considerations will help in making an initial judgment as to whether or not a filtration device is the appropriate BMP for the site. | ||
− | :'''Drainage Area:''' Five acres maximum ''RECOMMENDED'' (0.5 to 2 acres is ideal). [[Types of filtration#Surface sand filter|Surface sand filters]] can sometimes be sized for drainage areas up to 10 acres, but only with rigorous and committed maintenance schedules, among other design and O&M considerations. | + | :'''Drainage Area:''' Five acres maximum ''RECOMMENDED'' (0.5 to 2 acres is ideal). [[Types of filtration#Surface sand filter|Surface sand filters]] can sometimes be sized for drainage areas up to 10 acres, but only with rigorous and committed maintenance schedules, among other design and O&M considerations. For more information on contributing area, see [[Contributing drainage area to stormwater BMPs]]. |
:'''Site Topography and Slopes:''' It is ''RECOMMENDED'' that sloped areas immediately adjacent to the practice be less than 33 percent but greater than 1 percent, to promote positive flow towards the practice. | :'''Site Topography and Slopes:''' It is ''RECOMMENDED'' that sloped areas immediately adjacent to the practice be less than 33 percent but greater than 1 percent, to promote positive flow towards the practice. | ||
:'''Soils:''' No restrictions for media filters with [[Glossary#U|underdrains]]. [[Glossary#V|Vegetated filters]] should be sized assuming no losses to infiltration. | :'''Soils:''' No restrictions for media filters with [[Glossary#U|underdrains]]. [[Glossary#V|Vegetated filters]] should be sized assuming no losses to infiltration. | ||
Line 43: | Line 55: | ||
*Pipe socks may be needed for underdrains imbedded in sand. If pipe socks are used, then use circular knit fabric. | *Pipe socks may be needed for underdrains imbedded in sand. If pipe socks are used, then use circular knit fabric. | ||
− | The procedure to size underdrains is typically determined by the project engineer. An example for sizing underdrains is found in Section 5.7 of the [ | + | The procedure to size underdrains is typically determined by the project engineer. An example for sizing underdrains is found in Section 5.7 of the [https://deq.nc.gov/about/divisions/energy-mineral-and-land-resources/stormwater/stormwater-program/stormwater-design North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Stormwater BMP Manual]. |
− | === | + | ===Pretreatment=== |
− | + | Pretreatment refers to features of a filtration area that capture and remove coarse sediment particles. | |
{{alert|To prevent clogging of the infiltration or filtration system with trash, gross solids, and particulate matter, use of a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, vegetated swale, small sedimentation basin (forebay), or water quality inlet (e.g., grit chamber) to settle particulates before the stormwater discharges into the infiltration or filtration system is REQUIRED.|alert-danger}} | {{alert|To prevent clogging of the infiltration or filtration system with trash, gross solids, and particulate matter, use of a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, vegetated swale, small sedimentation basin (forebay), or water quality inlet (e.g., grit chamber) to settle particulates before the stormwater discharges into the infiltration or filtration system is REQUIRED.|alert-danger}} | ||
− | For applications where runoff enters the filtration area through sheet flow, such as from parking lots, or residential back yards, a grass filter strip with a pea gravel diaphragm is the preferred | + | For applications where runoff enters the filtration area through sheet flow, such as from parking lots, or residential back yards, a grass filter strip with a pea gravel diaphragm is the preferred pretreatment method. The width of the filter strip depends on the drainage area, imperviousness and the filter strip slope. The minimum RECOMMENDED vegetated filter strip width is 3 feet. The width should increase with increasing slope of the filter strip. Slopes should not exceed 8 percent. Pretreatment filter strips greater than 15 feet in width will provide diminishing marginal utility on the installation cost. |
− | For retrofit projects and sites with tight green space constraints, it may not be possible to include a grass buffer strip. For example, parking lot island retrofits may not have adequate space to provide a grass buffer. For applications where concentrated (or channelized) runoff enters the filtration area, such as through a slotted curb opening, a grassed channel with a pea gravel diaphragm is the preferred | + | For retrofit projects and sites with tight green space constraints, it may not be possible to include a grass buffer strip. For example, parking lot island retrofits may not have adequate space to provide a grass buffer. For applications where concentrated (or channelized) runoff enters the filtration area, such as through a slotted curb opening, a grassed channel with a pea gravel diaphragm is the preferred pretreatment method. |
The filtration area should be inspected semi-annually to determine if accumulated sediment needs to be removed. Accumulated sediment should be removed from the gravel verge (if applicable) and vegetated filter strip as needed. If the watershed runoff is especially dirty, this frequency may need to be monthly or quarterly. Trash removal should occur in conjunction with removal of debris from the filtration area. During maintenance, check for erosion in the filter strip. If it is visible, it should be repaired with topsoil and re-planted. Vegetation of the filter strip should be designed at least 2 inches below the contributing impervious surface. If, over time, the grade of the vegetated filter strip rises above the adjacent impervious surface draining into it, the grade of the vegetated filter strip needs to be lowered to ensure proper drainage. | The filtration area should be inspected semi-annually to determine if accumulated sediment needs to be removed. Accumulated sediment should be removed from the gravel verge (if applicable) and vegetated filter strip as needed. If the watershed runoff is especially dirty, this frequency may need to be monthly or quarterly. Trash removal should occur in conjunction with removal of debris from the filtration area. During maintenance, check for erosion in the filter strip. If it is visible, it should be repaired with topsoil and re-planted. Vegetation of the filter strip should be designed at least 2 inches below the contributing impervious surface. If, over time, the grade of the vegetated filter strip rises above the adjacent impervious surface draining into it, the grade of the vegetated filter strip needs to be lowered to ensure proper drainage. | ||
− | In lieu of grass buffer strips, | + | In lieu of grass buffer strips, pretreatment may be accomplished by other methods such as sediment capture in the curb-line entrance areas. Additionally, the parking lot spaces may be used for a temporary storage and pretreatment area in lieu of a grass buffer strip. Local requirements may allow a street sweeping program as an acceptable pretreatment practice. It is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that pretreatment incorporate as many of the following as are feasible: |
*grass filter strip; | *grass filter strip; | ||
*vegetated swale; | *vegetated swale; | ||
Line 76: | Line 88: | ||
===Landscaping=== | ===Landscaping=== | ||
− | It is ''HIGHLY RECOMMENDED'' that impervious area construction be completed and pervious areas established with dense and healthy vegetation (see [[Minnesota plant lists]] or [ | + | It is ''HIGHLY RECOMMENDED'' that impervious area construction be completed and pervious areas established with dense and healthy vegetation (see [[Minnesota plant lists]] or [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Minnesota_plant_lists Plants for Stormwater Design]) prior to introduction of stormwater into a filtration practice. |
Surface filters can have a grass cover to aid in pollutant adsorption. The grass should be capable of withstanding frequent periods of inundation and drought. | Surface filters can have a grass cover to aid in pollutant adsorption. The grass should be capable of withstanding frequent periods of inundation and drought. | ||
Line 310: | Line 322: | ||
====Step 8: Calculate draw-down time==== | ====Step 8: Calculate draw-down time==== | ||
− | '''Dry swale''': The bed of the dry swale consists of a permeable soil layer of at least 30 inches in depth, above an 8-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe ([http://www.transportation.org/Pages/default.aspx AASHTO | + | '''Dry swale''': The bed of the dry swale consists of a permeable soil layer of at least 30 inches in depth, above an 8-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe ([http://www.transportation.org/Pages/default.aspx https://standards.globalspec.com/std/14289640/AASHTO%20M%20252 M 252]) longitudinal under-drain in a 12-inch gravel layer. The soil media should have an infiltration rate of at least 0.5 feet per day (fpd) with a maximum of 1.5 fpd and contain a high level of organic material to facilitate pollutant removal. A permeable filter fabric is placed between the gravel layer and the overlying soil. Dry swale channels are sized to store and filter the entire V<sub>wq</sub> and allow for full filtering through the permeable soil layer. |
====Step 9. Check 2-year and 10-year velocity erosion potential and freeboard==== | ====Step 9. Check 2-year and 10-year velocity erosion potential and freeboard==== | ||
Line 321: | Line 333: | ||
Inlets to swales must be provided with energy dissipaters such as riprap or geotextile reinforcement. Pre-treatment of runoff in both a dry and wet swale system is typically provided by a sediment forebay located at the inlet. Enhanced swale systems that receive direct concentrated runoff may have a 6-inch drop to a pea gravel diaphragm flow spreader at the upstream end of the control. A pea gravel diaphragm and gentle side slopes should be provided along the top of channels to provide pre-treatment for lateral sheet flows. The under-drain system should discharge to the storm drainage infrastructure or a stable outfall. For a wet swale, do not use an under-drain system. | Inlets to swales must be provided with energy dissipaters such as riprap or geotextile reinforcement. Pre-treatment of runoff in both a dry and wet swale system is typically provided by a sediment forebay located at the inlet. Enhanced swale systems that receive direct concentrated runoff may have a 6-inch drop to a pea gravel diaphragm flow spreader at the upstream end of the control. A pea gravel diaphragm and gentle side slopes should be provided along the top of channels to provide pre-treatment for lateral sheet flows. The under-drain system should discharge to the storm drainage infrastructure or a stable outfall. For a wet swale, do not use an under-drain system. | ||
− | ====Step 12. Check volume, peak discharge rates and | + | ====Step 12. Check volume, peak discharge rates and drawdown time against State, local and watershed organization requirements (Note: Steps are iterative)==== |
Follow the design procedures identified in the [[Unified sizing criteria|Unified Sizing Criteria]] section of the Manual to determine the volume control and peak discharge requirements for water quality, recharge (not required), channel protection, overbank flood and extreme storm. | Follow the design procedures identified in the [[Unified sizing criteria|Unified Sizing Criteria]] section of the Manual to determine the volume control and peak discharge requirements for water quality, recharge (not required), channel protection, overbank flood and extreme storm. | ||
Line 327: | Line 339: | ||
{{alert|The following items are specifically REQUIRED by the MPCA Permit: | {{alert|The following items are specifically REQUIRED by the MPCA Permit: | ||
− | A. Volume | + | A. Volume: Filtration systems shall be sufficient to filter a water quality volume of 1 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. If this criterion is not met,increase the storage volume of the filtration practice or treat excess water quality volume (V<sub>wq</sub>) in an upstream or downstream BMP (see Step 5). |
− | Filtration systems shall be sufficient to filter a water quality volume of 1 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. If this criterion is not met,increase the storage volume of the filtration practice or treat excess water quality volume (V<sub>wq</sub>) in an upstream or downstream BMP (see Step 5). | + | B. Drawdown: Filtration practices shall discharge through the soil or filter media in 48 hours or less. Additional flows that cannot be infiltrated or filtered in 48 hours should be routed to bypass the system through a stabilized discharge point.|alert-danger}} |
− | |||
− | B. Drawdown | ||
− | Filtration practices shall discharge through the soil or filter media in 48 hours or less. Additional flows that cannot be infiltrated or filtered in 48 hours should be routed to bypass the system through a stabilized discharge point.|alert-danger}} | ||
Experience has demonstrated that, although the drawdown period is 48 hours, there is often some residual water pooled in the infiltration practice after 48 hours. This residual water may be associated with reduced head, water gathered in depressions within the practice, water trapped by vegetation, and so on. The drawdown period is therefore defined as the time from the high water level in the practice to 1 to 2 inches above the bottom of the facility. This criterion was established to provide the following: wet-dry cycling between rainfall events; unsuitable mosquito breeding habitat; suitable habitat for vegetation; aerobic conditions; and storage for back-to-back precipitation events. This time period has also been called the period of inundation. | Experience has demonstrated that, although the drawdown period is 48 hours, there is often some residual water pooled in the infiltration practice after 48 hours. This residual water may be associated with reduced head, water gathered in depressions within the practice, water trapped by vegetation, and so on. The drawdown period is therefore defined as the time from the high water level in the practice to 1 to 2 inches above the bottom of the facility. This criterion was established to provide the following: wet-dry cycling between rainfall events; unsuitable mosquito breeding habitat; suitable habitat for vegetation; aerobic conditions; and storage for back-to-back precipitation events. This time period has also been called the period of inundation. | ||
Line 348: | Line 357: | ||
<noinclude> | <noinclude> | ||
==Related pages== | ==Related pages== | ||
− | *[[Overview for | + | *[[Overview for sand (media) filters]] |
− | *[[Types of | + | *[[Types of sand (media) filters]] |
− | *[[Design criteria for filtration]] | + | *Design criteria for sand (media) filters |
− | *[[Construction specifications for | + | **See [[Design criteria for filtration]] |
− | *[[Assessing the performance of | + | *[[Construction specifications for sand (media) filters]] |
− | * | + | *[[Assessing the performance of sand (media) filters]] |
− | *[[Operation and maintenance of filtration]] | + | *Operation and maintenance of sand (media) filters |
− | *[[Calculating credits for sand | + | **See [[Operation and maintenance of filtration]] |
− | *[[Calculating credits for | + | *Calculating credits |
− | *[[Cost-benefit considerations for | + | **[[Calculating credits for sand (media) filters]] |
− | *[[ | + | **[[Calculating credits for iron enhanced sand filter]] |
+ | *[[Cost-benefit considerations for sand (media) filters]] | ||
+ | *[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=References_for_filtration References for sand (media) filters] | ||
+ | *[[Requirements, recommendations and information for using sand filter as a BMP in the MIDS calculator]] | ||
+ | *[[CADD images for individual best management practices|Links to detail images]] | ||
+ | **Perimiter sand filter details: [[File:Perimeter Sand Filter PERIMETER SAND FILTER DETAILS (1).pdf]] | ||
+ | **Surface sand filter: [[File:SURFACE Sand Filter3 Surface sand filter (1).pdf]] | ||
+ | **Underground sand filter: [[File:UNDERGROUND SAND FILTER Layout2 (1).pdf]] | ||
+ | *[[Calculating credits for dry swale (grass swale)]] | ||
+ | *[[Calculating credits for dry swale (grass swale)|Step-pool]] | ||
+ | *[[Calculating credits for wet swale (wetland channel)]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | *[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Category:Level_3_-_General_information,_reference,_tables,_images,_and_archives/Images/Sand_filter,_iron_enhanced_sand_filter,_media_filter_photos Sand filter and iron enhanced sand filter photos] | ||
+ | *[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Category:Level_3_-_General_information,_reference,_tables,_images,_and_archives/Tables/Sand_filter,_iron_enhanced_sand_filter,_media_filter Sand filter and iron enhanced sand filter tables] | ||
+ | *[[Fact sheet for filtration|'''Fact sheet for filtration''']] (Includes vegetated filters) | ||
− | [[ | + | [[Category:Level 3 - Best management practices/Specifications and details/Design criteria]] |
</noinclude> | </noinclude> |
The following terminology is used throughout this design section:
HIGHLY RECOMMENDED - Indicates design guidance that is extremely beneficial or necessary for proper functioning of the filtration practice, but not specifically required by the MPCA CGP.
RECOMMENDED - Indicates design guidance that is helpful for filtration practice performance but not critical to the design.
Implicit in the design guidance is the fact that many design elements of infiltration and filtration systems can minimize the maintenance burden and maintain pollutant removal efficiency. Key examples include
For more information on design information for individual infiltration and filtration practices, link here.
Before deciding to use a filtration device for stormwater management, it is helpful to consider several items that bear on the feasibility of using such a device at a given location. The following list of considerations will help in making an initial judgment as to whether or not a filtration device is the appropriate BMP for the site.
It is Highly Recommended that the designer provides non-erosive flow velocities at the outlet point to reduce downstream erosion. During the 10-year or 25-year storm (depending on local drainage criteria), discharge velocity should be kept below 4 feet per second for established grassed channels. Erosion control matting or rock should be specified if higher velocities are expected.
Common overflow systems within the structure consist of a yard drain inlet, where the top of the yard drain inlet is placed at the elevation of the shallow ponding area. A stone drop of about 12 inches or small stilling basin could be provided at the inlet of filtration areas where flow enters the practice through curb cuts or other concentrated flow inlets. In cases with significant drop in grade this erosion protection should be extended to the bottom of the facility.
The following are RECOMMENDED for filtration practices with underdrains.
The procedure to size underdrains is typically determined by the project engineer. An example for sizing underdrains is found in Section 5.7 of the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Stormwater BMP Manual.
Pretreatment refers to features of a filtration area that capture and remove coarse sediment particles.
For applications where runoff enters the filtration area through sheet flow, such as from parking lots, or residential back yards, a grass filter strip with a pea gravel diaphragm is the preferred pretreatment method. The width of the filter strip depends on the drainage area, imperviousness and the filter strip slope. The minimum RECOMMENDED vegetated filter strip width is 3 feet. The width should increase with increasing slope of the filter strip. Slopes should not exceed 8 percent. Pretreatment filter strips greater than 15 feet in width will provide diminishing marginal utility on the installation cost.
For retrofit projects and sites with tight green space constraints, it may not be possible to include a grass buffer strip. For example, parking lot island retrofits may not have adequate space to provide a grass buffer. For applications where concentrated (or channelized) runoff enters the filtration area, such as through a slotted curb opening, a grassed channel with a pea gravel diaphragm is the preferred pretreatment method.
The filtration area should be inspected semi-annually to determine if accumulated sediment needs to be removed. Accumulated sediment should be removed from the gravel verge (if applicable) and vegetated filter strip as needed. If the watershed runoff is especially dirty, this frequency may need to be monthly or quarterly. Trash removal should occur in conjunction with removal of debris from the filtration area. During maintenance, check for erosion in the filter strip. If it is visible, it should be repaired with topsoil and re-planted. Vegetation of the filter strip should be designed at least 2 inches below the contributing impervious surface. If, over time, the grade of the vegetated filter strip rises above the adjacent impervious surface draining into it, the grade of the vegetated filter strip needs to be lowered to ensure proper drainage.
In lieu of grass buffer strips, pretreatment may be accomplished by other methods such as sediment capture in the curb-line entrance areas. Additionally, the parking lot spaces may be used for a temporary storage and pretreatment area in lieu of a grass buffer strip. Local requirements may allow a street sweeping program as an acceptable pretreatment practice. It is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that pretreatment incorporate as many of the following as are feasible:
The following guidelines are applicable to the actual treatment area of a filtration facility:
It is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that impervious area construction be completed and pervious areas established with dense and healthy vegetation (see Minnesota plant lists or Plants for Stormwater Design) prior to introduction of stormwater into a filtration practice.
Surface filters can have a grass cover to aid in pollutant adsorption. The grass should be capable of withstanding frequent periods of inundation and drought.
Additional information on safety for construction sites is available from OSHA.
The following steps outline a recommended design procedure for media filters. Except where indicated, procedures are consistent with requirements for compliance with the MPCA CGP.
Make a preliminary judgment as to whether site conditions are appropriate for the use of a surface or perimeter sand filter, and identify the function of the filter in the overall treatment system.
Once the Physical feasibility initial check is complete, apply the better site design principles in sizing and locating the filtration practice(s) on the development site. Given the drainage area, select the appropriate filtration practice for the first iteration of the design process.
Note: Information collected during the Physical feasibility initial check (see Step 2) should be used to explore the potential for multiple filtration practices versus relying on a single facility. The use of smaller filtration practices dispersed around a development is usually more sustainable than a single regional facility that is more likely to have maintenance problems (Source: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Conservation Practice Standards, 2004).
Calculate the Water Quality Volume (Vwq).
If part of the overall Vwq is to be treated by other BMPs, subtract that portion from the Vwq to determine the part of the Vwq to be treated by the filter.
A flow regulator (or flow splitter diversion structure) should be supplied to divert the Vwq to the sand filter facility. This is generally accomplished by setting the bypass weir within the diversion to the elevation of the water quality volume within the practice. Please refer to the adjustable diversion detail found in the Computer-aided design and drafting (CAD/CADD) drawings section.
Size low flow orifice, weir, or other device to pass Qwq.
To meet requirements of the Stormwater General Permit (CSW permit), the surface area (AS, in square feet) of a media filter practice is given by
\(A_S = V_w / (D_O) \)
Size the depth of the practice the meet the 48 hour draw down time. The maximum recommended depth of a media filter practice is 4 feet
The water treatment volume is given by
\(V_w = 0.0833 A_c\)
The entire water treatment volume is assumed to instantaneously pond in the media filter practice.
For a filtration BMP with sloped sides, the surface area (As) of the practice is the average area of the BMP, given by
\( A_S = (A_O + A_M) / 2 \)
Set preliminary dimensions of media filter basin chamber. The following guidelines are HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.
Pre-treatment refers to features of a filtration system that capture and remove coarse sediment particles.
For applications where runoff enters the filtration system through sheet flow, such as from parking lots, or residential back yards, a vegetated filter strip with a pea gravel diaphragm is the preferred pre-treatment method. The width of the filter strip depends on the drainage area, imperviousness and the filter strip slope. The minimum RECOMMENDED vegetated filter strip width is 3 feet. The width should increase with increasing slope of the filter strip. Slopes should not exceed 8 percent. Pretreatment filter strips greater than 15 feet in width will provide diminishing marginal utility on the installation cost.
For retrofit projects and sites with tight green space constraints, it may not be possible to include a grass buffer strip. For example, parking lot island retrofits may not have adequate space to provide a grass buffer. For applications where concentrated (or channelized) runoff enters the filtration system, such as through a slotted curb opening, a vegetated filter strip with a pea gravel diaphragm is the preferred pre-treatment method.
The filtration system should be inspected semi-annually to determine if accumulated sediment needs to be removed. Accumulated sediment should be removed from the gravel verge (if applicable) and vegetated filter strip as needed. If the watershed runoff is especially dirty, this frequency may need to be monthly or quarterly. Trash removal should occur in conjunction with removal of debris from the filtration system. During maintenance, check for erosion in the filter strip. If it is visible, it should be repaired with topsoil and re-planted. Vegetation of the filter strip should be designed at least 2 inches below the contributing impervious surface. If, over time, the grade of the vegetated filter strip rises above the adjacent impervious surface draining into it, the grade of the vegetated filter strip needs to be lowered to ensure proper drainage.
The type of vegetation in the bioretention cell determines the appropriate flow velocity for which the pre-treatment device should be designed. For tree-shrub-mulch bioretention cells, velocity through the pre-treatment device should not exceed 1 foot per second, which is the velocity that causes incipient motion of mulch. For grassed bioretention cells, flow velocity through the pre-treatment device should not exceed 3 feet per second. In all cases, appropriate maintenance access should be provided to pre-treatment devices.
In lieu of grass buffer strips, pre-treatment may be accomplished by other methods such as sediment capture in the curb-line entrance areas. Additionally, the parking lot spaces may be used for a temporary storage and pre-treatment area in lieu of a grass buffer strip. If bioretention is used to treat runoff from a parking lot or roadway that is frequently sanded during snow events, there is a high potential for clogging from sand in runoff. Local requirements may allow a street sweeping program as an acceptable pre-treatment practice. It is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that pre-treatment incorporate as many of the following as are feasible:
This table shows sand material specifications.
Link to this table
Parameter | specification | Size | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Sand | clean AASHTO M-6 or ASTM C-33 concrete sand | 0.02” to 0.04” | Sand substitutions such as Diabase and Graystone #10 are not acceptable. No calcium carbonated or dolomitic sand substitutions are acceptable. Rock dust cannot be substituted for sand. |
Underdrain Gravel | AASHTO M-43 | 1.5” to 3.5” | |
Geotextile Fabric (if required) |
ASTM D-4833 (puncture strength - 125 lb.) ASTM D-1117 (Mullen Burst Strength - 400 psi) ASTM D-4632 (Tensile Strength - 300 lb.) |
0.08” thick equivalent opening size of #80 sieve | Must maintain 125 gpm per sq. ft. flow rate. Note: a 4” pea gravel layer may be substituted for geotextiles meant to separate sand filter layers. |
Impermeable Liner (if required) |
ASTM D-4833 (thickness) ASTM D-412 (tensile strength 1,100 lb., elongation 200%) ASTM D-624 (Tear resistance - 150 lb./in) ASTM D-471 (water adsorption: +8 to -2% mass) |
30 mil thickness | Liner to be ultraviolet resistant. A geotextile fabric should be used to protect the liner from puncture. |
Under-drain Piping | ASTM D-1785 or AASHTO M-278 | minimum 4” rigid schedule 40 PVC | 3/8” perf. @ 6” on center, 4 holes per row; minimum of 3” washed #57 stone over pipes; not necessary underneath pipes |
Surface sand filter:
Perimeter sand filter:
Follow the design procedures identified in the section on Unified sizing criteria to determine the volume control and peak discharge requirements for water quality, recharge (not required), channel protection, overbank flood and extreme storm. Adapt these values to local regulations, if any exist.
Model the proposed development scenario using a surface water model appropriate for the hydrologic and hydraulic design considerations specific to the site (see also the section on stormwater modeling). This includes defining the parameters of the filtration practice defined above: pond elevation and area (defines the pond volume), filtration rate and method of application (effective filtration area), and outlet structure and/or flow diversion information. The results of this analysis can be used to determine unintended consequences upstream (i.e. flooding).
Experience has demonstrated that, although the drawdown period is 48 hours, there is often some residual water pooled in the infiltration practice after 48 hours. This residual water may be associated with reduced head, water gathered in depressions within the practice, water trapped by vegetation, and so on. The drawdown period is therefore defined as the time from the high water level in the practice to 1 to 2 inches above the bottom of the facility. This criterion was established to provide the following: wet-dry cycling between rainfall events; unsuitable mosquito breeding habitat; suitable habitat for vegetation; aerobic conditions; and storage for back-to-back precipitation events. This time period has also been called the period of inundation.
See Major design elements section for guidance on preparing vegetation and landscaping management plan.
See Operation and maintenance section for guidance on preparing an O&M plan.
See Cost considerations section for guidance on preparing a cost estimate that includes both construction and maintenance costs.
The following steps outline a recommended design procedure for vegetative filters in compliance with the MPCA Permit for new construction. Design recommendations beyond those specifically required by the permit are also included and marked accordingly.
Make a preliminary judgment as to whether site conditions are appropriate for the use of a vegetative filter, and identify the function of the filter in the overall treatment system
A. Consider basic issues for initial suitability screening, including:
B. Determine how the vegetative filter will fit into the overall stormwater treatment system
A. Determine whether the vegetative filter must comply with the MPCA Permit.
B. Check with local officials, watershed organizations, and other agencies to determine if there are any additional restrictions and/or surface water or watershed requirements that may apply.
Once the physical suitability evaluation is complete, it is HIGHLY RECOMMENDED that the better site design principles be applied in sizing and locating the filtration practice(s) on the development site. Given the drainage area, select the appropriate filtration practice for the first iteration of the design process.
Note: Information collected during the physical suitability evaluation (see Step 1) should be used to explore the potential for multiple filtration practices versus relying on a single facility. The use of smaller filtration practices dispersed around a development is usually more sustainable that a single regional facility that is more likely to have maintenance problems (Source: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Conservation Practice Standards, 2004)
Calculate the Water Quality Volume (Vwq), Channel Protection Volume (Vcp), Overbank Flood Protection Volume (Vp10), and the Extreme Flood Volume (Vp100).
If the vegetative filter is being designed to meet the requirements of the MPCA Permit, the REQUIRED treatment volume is the water quality volume of 1 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created from the project. If part of the overall Vwq is to be treated by other BMPs, subtract that portion from the Vwq to determine the part of the Vwq to be treated by the filter.
For filter strips, compute the following design parameters:
a. Calculate the maximum discharge loading per foot of filter strip width
\( q = (0.00236/n)Y^{1.67}S^{0.5} \)
Where:
b. Use a recommended hydrologic model to compute Qwq
c. Minimum Filter Width (in feet) = Qwq / q
Where:
One alternative is a level spreader that allows coarse sediment to settle and evenly distributes flow across the full width of the filter. Pre-treatment could be provided with plunge pools where concentrated flows enter and with level spreaders where lateral flows enter. Additional pre-treatment measures include filter strips and street/parking lot sweeping. Street/parking lot sweeping may be considered pre-treatment in the case of a parking lot island or other area where spatial limitations make structural pre-treatment measures unfeasible.
Storage volume created for pre-treatment counts toward the total Vwq requirement, and should be subtracted from the Vwq for subsequent calculations.
Wet and dry swales:
If the system is on-line, channels should be sized to convey runoff from the overbank flood event (Vp10) safely with a minimum of 6 inches of freeboard and without damage to adjacent property. The peak velocity for the 2-year storm must be nonerosive for the soil and vegetative cover provided.
The channel and under-drain excavation should be limited to the width and depth specified in the design. The bottom of the excavated trench shall not be loaded in a way that causes soil compaction, and scarified prior to placement of gravel and permeable soil. The sides of the channel shall be trimmed of all large roots. The sidewalls shall be uniform with no voids and scarified prior to backfilling.
Wet and Dry Swales: Checkdams
Filter Strips: Berms
Dry swale: The bed of the dry swale consists of a permeable soil layer of at least 30 inches in depth, above an 8-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe (https://standards.globalspec.com/std/14289640/AASHTO%20M%20252 M 252) longitudinal under-drain in a 12-inch gravel layer. The soil media should have an infiltration rate of at least 0.5 feet per day (fpd) with a maximum of 1.5 fpd and contain a high level of organic material to facilitate pollutant removal. A permeable filter fabric is placed between the gravel layer and the overlying soil. Dry swale channels are sized to store and filter the entire Vwq and allow for full filtering through the permeable soil layer.
Check for erosive velocities and modify design as appropriate based on local conveyance regulations. Provide 6 inches of freeboard.
Design control to pass Vwq in 48 hours.
Inlets to swales must be provided with energy dissipaters such as riprap or geotextile reinforcement. Pre-treatment of runoff in both a dry and wet swale system is typically provided by a sediment forebay located at the inlet. Enhanced swale systems that receive direct concentrated runoff may have a 6-inch drop to a pea gravel diaphragm flow spreader at the upstream end of the control. A pea gravel diaphragm and gentle side slopes should be provided along the top of channels to provide pre-treatment for lateral sheet flows. The under-drain system should discharge to the storm drainage infrastructure or a stable outfall. For a wet swale, do not use an under-drain system.
Follow the design procedures identified in the Unified Sizing Criteria section of the Manual to determine the volume control and peak discharge requirements for water quality, recharge (not required), channel protection, overbank flood and extreme storm.
Model the proposed development scenario using a surface water model appropriate for the hydrologic and hydraulic design considerations specific to the site. This includes defining the parameters of the filtration practice defined above: pond elevation and area (defines the pond volume), filtration rate and method of application (effective filtration area), and outlet structure and/or flow diversion information. The results of this analysis can be used to determine whether or not the proposed design meets the applicable requirements. If not, the design will have to be re-evaluated.
A. Volume: Filtration systems shall be sufficient to filter a water quality volume of 1 inch of runoff from the new impervious surfaces created by the project. If this criterion is not met,increase the storage volume of the filtration practice or treat excess water quality volume (Vwq) in an upstream or downstream BMP (see Step 5).
B. Drawdown: Filtration practices shall discharge through the soil or filter media in 48 hours or less. Additional flows that cannot be infiltrated or filtered in 48 hours should be routed to bypass the system through a stabilized discharge point.Experience has demonstrated that, although the drawdown period is 48 hours, there is often some residual water pooled in the infiltration practice after 48 hours. This residual water may be associated with reduced head, water gathered in depressions within the practice, water trapped by vegetation, and so on. The drawdown period is therefore defined as the time from the high water level in the practice to 1 to 2 inches above the bottom of the facility. This criterion was established to provide the following: wet-dry cycling between rainfall events; unsuitable mosquito breeding habitat; suitable habitat for vegetation; aerobic conditions; and storage for back-to-back precipitation events. This time period has also been called the period of inundation.
A landscaping plan for a dry or wet swale should be prepared to indicate how the enhanced swale system will be stabilized and established with vegetation. Landscape design should specify proper grass species and wetland plants based on specific site, soils and hydric conditions present along the channel.
This table shows sand material specifications.
Link to this table
Parameter | specification | Size | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Sand | clean AASHTO M-6 or ASTM C-33 concrete sand | 0.02” to 0.04” | Sand substitutions such as Diabase and Graystone #10 are not acceptable. No calcium carbonated or dolomitic sand substitutions are acceptable. Rock dust cannot be substituted for sand. |
Underdrain Gravel | AASHTO M-43 | 1.5” to 3.5” | |
Geotextile Fabric (if required) |
ASTM D-4833 (puncture strength - 125 lb.) ASTM D-1117 (Mullen Burst Strength - 400 psi) ASTM D-4632 (Tensile Strength - 300 lb.) |
0.08” thick equivalent opening size of #80 sieve | Must maintain 125 gpm per sq. ft. flow rate. Note: a 4” pea gravel layer may be substituted for geotextiles meant to separate sand filter layers. |
Impermeable Liner (if required) |
ASTM D-4833 (thickness) ASTM D-412 (tensile strength 1,100 lb., elongation 200%) ASTM D-624 (Tear resistance - 150 lb./in) ASTM D-471 (water adsorption: +8 to -2% mass) |
30 mil thickness | Liner to be ultraviolet resistant. A geotextile fabric should be used to protect the liner from puncture. |
Under-drain Piping | ASTM D-1785 or AASHTO M-278 | minimum 4” rigid schedule 40 PVC | 3/8” perf. @ 6” on center, 4 holes per row; minimum of 3” washed #57 stone over pipes; not necessary underneath pipes |
See Operation and Maintenance section for guidance on preparing an O&M plan.
See Cost Considerations section for guidance on preparing a cost estimate that includes both construction and maintenance costs.
This page was last edited on 29 December 2022, at 18:54.