m |
m |
||
Line 176: | Line 176: | ||
| High | | High | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | colspan="4" style="text-align: center;" | <font size=1><sup>1</sup> Unless the infiltration practice is located in an industrial area with exposed significant materials or from vehicle fuelling and maintenance areas. Infiltration BMPs are PROHIBITED in these areas; <sup>2</sup> This is only for the portion of flow that enters the infiltration basin; by-passed runoff does not receive treatment; <sup>3</sup> Low = < 30%; Medium = 30-65%; High = 65 -100%); <sup>4</sup> Assumes adequate pre-treatment; <sup>5</sup> This assumes no | + | | colspan="4" style="text-align: center;" | <font size=1><sup>1</sup> Unless the infiltration practice is located in an industrial area with exposed significant materials or from vehicle fuelling and maintenance areas. Infiltration BMPs are PROHIBITED in these areas; <sup>2</sup> This is only for the portion of flow that enters the infiltration basin; by-passed runoff does not receive treatment; <sup>3</sup> Low = < 30%; Medium = 30-65%; High = 65 -100%); <sup>4</sup> Assumes adequate pre-treatment; <sup>5</sup> This assumes no underdrain; <sup>6</sup> Certain [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Design_criteria_for_bioretention#Materials_specifications_-_filter_media soil mixes] can leach P; <sup>7</sup> Due to a size restriction<br> |
Sources: EPA Factsheet, 1999; Davis et al., 2001, 2003, 2006; Hsieh and Davis, 2005; Hong et al., 2006; Hunt et al., 2006; NPRPD, 2007; Li and Davis, 2009; Diblasi et al., 2009; Passeport et al., 2009; Brown et at., 2011a, b; Komlos et al., 2012; Denich et al., 2013; Li and Davis, 2013; California Stormwater BMP | Sources: EPA Factsheet, 1999; Davis et al., 2001, 2003, 2006; Hsieh and Davis, 2005; Hong et al., 2006; Hunt et al., 2006; NPRPD, 2007; Li and Davis, 2009; Diblasi et al., 2009; Passeport et al., 2009; Brown et at., 2011a, b; Komlos et al., 2012; Denich et al., 2013; Li and Davis, 2013; California Stormwater BMP | ||
</font size> | </font size> |
Best Management Practices that infiltrate stormwater runoff into underlying soil include, but are not limited, to
These are discussed briefly below.
Applications and treatment capabilities for infiltration basins | |||
Applications | Treatment capabilities3, 4, 5 | ||
Residential | Yes | TSS | High6 |
Commercial | Yes | TN | Medium/high |
Ultra-urban | Limited1 | TP | Medium/high |
Industrial | Yes2 | Chloride | Low |
Highway/road | Limited | Metals | High |
Recreational | Yes | Oils and grease | High |
Pathogens | High | ||
1 Due to a size restriction; 2 Unless the infiltration practice is located in an industrial area with exposed significant materials or from vehicle fueling and maintenance areas. Infiltration BMPs are PROHIBITED in these areas; 3Underground infiltration systems may have different (likely lower) pollutant removal capabilities than what is provided in this table. These systems may have a wider application range. 4 This is only for the portion of flow that enters the infiltration basin; by-passed runoff does not receive treatment; 5 Low = < 30%; Medium = 30-65%; High = 65 -100%); 6 Assumes adequate pre-treatment Sources: Schueler, 1987, 1992; USEPA 1993a, 1993b; Maniquiz et al., 2010; NPRPD, 2007; California Stormwater Manual, 2009; Pennsylvania Stormwater Manual, 2006 |
An infiltration basin is a natural or constructed impoundment that captures, temporarily stores, and infiltrates a design volume of water. For more information, see the following pages in this Manual.
Applications and treatment capabilities for infiltration trenches | |||
Applications | Treatment capabilities3, 4 | ||
Residential | Yes | TSS5 | High5 |
Commercial | Yes | TN | Medium/high |
Ultra-urban | Limited1 | TP | Medium/high |
Industrial | Yes2 | Chloride | Low |
Highway/road | Yes | Metals | High |
Recreational | Yes | Oils and grease | High |
Pathogens | High | ||
1 Due to a size restriction; 2 Unless the infiltration practice is located in an industrial area with exposed significant materials or from vehicle fuelling and maintenance areas. Infiltration BMPs are PROHIBITED in these areas; 3 This is only for the portion of flow that enters the infiltration basin; by-passed runoff does not receive treatment; 4 Low = < 30%; Medium = 30-65%; High = 65 -100%); 5 Assumes adequate pre-treatment Sources: Schueler, 1987, 1992; USEPA 1993a, 1993b; Maniquiz et al., 2010; NPRPD, 2007; California Stormwater Manual, 2009; Pennsylvania Stormwater Manual, 2006 |
An infiltration trench is a shallow excavated trench that is backfilled with a coarse stone aggregate. This design allows for the temporary storage of runoff in the void space of the material in addition to the storage above the aggregate within the trench. For more information, see the following pages in this Manual.
Applications and treatment capabilities for bioinfiltration basins | |||
Applications | Treatment capabilities2, 3 | ||
Residential | Yes | TSS | High4 |
Commercial | Yes | TN | Low/Medium5 |
Ultra-urban | Limited7 | TP | Medium/high6 |
Industrial | Yes1 | Chloride | Low |
Highway/road | Yes | Metals | High |
Recreational | Yes | Oils and grease | High |
Pathogens | High | ||
1 Unless the infiltration practice is located in an industrial area with exposed significant materials or from vehicle fuelling and maintenance areas. Infiltration BMPs are PROHIBITED in these areas; 2 This is only for the portion of flow that enters the infiltration basin; by-passed runoff does not receive treatment; 3 Low = < 30%; Medium = 30-65%; High = 65 -100%); 4 Assumes adequate pre-treatment; 5 This assumes no underdrain; 6 Certain soil mixes can leach P; 7 Due to a size restriction Sources: EPA Factsheet, 1999; Davis et al., 2001, 2003, 2006; Hsieh and Davis, 2005; Hong et al., 2006; Hunt et al., 2006; NPRPD, 2007; Li and Davis, 2009; Diblasi et al., 2009; Passeport et al., 2009; Brown et at., 2011a, b; Komlos et al., 2012; Denich et al., 2013; Li and Davis, 2013; California Stormwater BMP |
Bioinfiltration basins, often called rain gardens, use soil (typically engineered media or mixed soil) and native vegetation to capture runoff and remove pollutants. Both the media and underlying soil typically have high infiltration rates that allow captured water to infiltrate within a required drawdown time, usually 48 hours. For more information, see the following pages in this Manual.
Applications and treatment capabilities for permeable pavement | |||
Applications | Treatment capabilities2, 3 | ||
Residential | Yes | TSS | High4 |
Commercial | Yes | TN | Medium/High |
Ultra-urban | Yes | Nitrate | Low/Medium |
Industrial | Yes1 | TP | Medium/High |
Retrofit | Yes | Chloride | Low |
Highway/road | Yes | Metals | High |
Recreational | Yes | Oils and grease | High |
Pathogens | 5 | ||
1 Unless the infiltration practice is located in an industrial area with exposed significant materials or from vehicle fuelling and maintenance areas. Infiltration BMPs are PROHIBITED in these areas; 2 This is only for the portion of flow that enters the infiltration basin; by-passed runoff does not receive treatment; 3 Low = < 30%; Medium = 30-65%; High = 65 -100%); 4 Assumes adequate pre-treatment; 5 Insufficient information Source: Schueler, 1987; Pratt et al, 1999; Adams, 2003; Brattebo and Booth, 2003; Adams, 2003; Bean et al, 2007; SEMCOG, 2008; International Stormwater Database, 2012 |
Permeable pavements allow stormwater runoff to pass through surface voids into an underlying stone reservoir/ subbase for temporary storage and/or infiltration. They are suitable for driveways, trails, parking lots, and roadways with lighter traffic. For more information, see the following pages in this Manual.
Applications and treatment capabilities for tree box/tree trench | |||
Applications | Treatment capabilities2, 3 | ||
Residential | Yes | TSS | High4 |
Commercial | Yes | TN | Low/Medium |
Ultra-urban | Yes | TP | Medium/High5 |
Industrial | Yes1 | Chloride | Low |
Highway/road | No | Metals | High |
Recreational | Yes | Oils and grease | High |
Pathogens | High | ||
1 Unless the infiltration practice is located in an industrial area with exposed significant materials or from vehicle fuelling and maintenance areas. Infiltration BMPs are PROHIBITED in these areas; 2 This is only for the portion of flow that enters the infiltration basin; by-passed runoff does not receive treatment; 3 Low = < 30%; Medium = 30-65%; High = 65 -100%); 4 Assumes adequate pre-treatment; 5 Certain soil mixes can leach P. Source: see [1] |
Tree trenches and tree boxes (collectively called tree BMPs), consist of trees planted within underground storage reservoirs designed to retain a volume of runoff for the purpose of uptake by trees. They are a variant of bioretention BMPs. For more information, see the following pages in this Manual.
Underground infiltration systems and dry wells have been installed below parking lots and other impervious surfaces on sites where insufficient space exists for a surface infiltration system. They are designed to temporarily store stormwater runoff before slowly infiltrating the water into the subsurface (Connecticut, 2004). There is limited information on the effectiveness of these systems in removing pollutants. Limited data suggests they may be less effective at removing mobile pollutants than surface-based infiltration systems.
One concern is that underground infiltration may meet the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) definition of a Class V injection well. Class V injection wells are defined as any bored, drilled, or driven shaft, or any dug hole that is deeper than its widest surface dimension. Class V injection wells can also be an improved sinkhole, or a subsurface fluid distribution system (from U.S. EPA, June 2003). The U.S. EPA administers Class V injection well permits in Minnesota. Minimum requirements for installing, permitting, and operating a Class V well is defined by the USEPA.
A second concern pertains to the overall pollutant removal effectiveness of those underground infiltration systems that do not meet the definition of a Class V injection well. The document released by the Transport Research Synthesis titled “Issues of Concern Related to Underground Infiltration Systems for Stormwater Management and Treatment” provides a good overview of the concerns related to underground infiltration systems (MNDOT, 2009). Issues identified in this report include:
This Manual currently does not provide guidance for design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of underground infiltration systems.
The following table provides a summary of unit processes for the different infiltration BMPs.
Unit processes of stormwater treatment techniques (Adapted from WEF, 2008)
Link to this table
Control | Infiltration basin | Infiltration trench | Bioinfiltration | Permeable pavement | Tree box/tree trench | Enhanced turf |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peak flow attenuation | X | X | X | X | ||
Runoff volume reduction | X | X | X | X | X | |
Infiltration | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Dispersion | ||||||
Evapotranspiration | X | X | ||||
Runoff collection and usage | X1 | X1 | ||||
Sedimentation | X | X | X | |||
Flotation | X | X | ||||
Laminar separation | ||||||
Swirl concentration | ||||||
Sorption | X | X | X | X | ||
Precipitation | X | X | X | X | ||
Coagulation | X | X | X | X | ||
Filtration | X | |||||
Plant metabolism | X | X | X | |||
Nitrification/denitrification | X | X | X | |||
Organic compound degradation | X | X | X | X | ||
Pathogen die off | X | X | X | |||
Temperature reduction | X | X | X | X | ||
Disinfection | X | X | X | X |
1 If underdrain is present