Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
#False: The CSW permit specifies infiltration is prohibited when contaminants will be mobilized. If infiltration practices can be located on a site such that contaminants on the site will not be mobilized, infiltration is acceptable. | #False: The CSW permit specifies infiltration is prohibited when contaminants will be mobilized. If infiltration practices can be located on a site such that contaminants on the site will not be mobilized, infiltration is acceptable. | ||
#False: Steady-state infiltration rates are applied in determining soil infiltration rates and feasibility at sites. Infiltration into soil, particularly unsaturated soil, is complex. Put on your physics cap and [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Soil_hydrologic_properties_and_processes read more here]. | #False: Steady-state infiltration rates are applied in determining soil infiltration rates and feasibility at sites. Infiltration into soil, particularly unsaturated soil, is complex. Put on your physics cap and [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Soil_hydrologic_properties_and_processes read more here]. | ||
− | + | #d - soil tensiometer. Tensiometers are used to measure soil water (moisture) content. See [[Determining soil infiltration rates]] | |
− | + | #a - This answer is somewhat negotiable, but typically we utilize infiltration for water quality and/or water quantity benefits. Other benefits can be incorporated into a practice, but they rarely are the reason for selecting infiltration at a site. See [[Green Infrastructure benefits of infiltration practices]] | |
− | |||
− | |||
#False: Just the opposite. Traditional design has been based on assumed vertical infiltration into underlying soil. Infiltration is three-dimensional and thus also occurs through the sidewalls of a practice. Also, designs in Minnesota assume an infiltration practice instantaneous fills with water. However, infiltration occurs as a practice is filling. This was considered to be offset by water bypassing an infiltration practice during intense rains, but recent data suggests this bypass accounts for a relatively small percentage of annual runoff (perhaps 2% or less). This is another area needing more research. See [https://wrc.umn.edu/events/new-horizon], [https://www.stormh2o.com/home/article/13006510/kerplunk], [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35405544/]. | #False: Just the opposite. Traditional design has been based on assumed vertical infiltration into underlying soil. Infiltration is three-dimensional and thus also occurs through the sidewalls of a practice. Also, designs in Minnesota assume an infiltration practice instantaneous fills with water. However, infiltration occurs as a practice is filling. This was considered to be offset by water bypassing an infiltration practice during intense rains, but recent data suggests this bypass accounts for a relatively small percentage of annual runoff (perhaps 2% or less). This is another area needing more research. See [https://wrc.umn.edu/events/new-horizon], [https://www.stormh2o.com/home/article/13006510/kerplunk], [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35405544/]. | ||
#We aren't sure. Studies in other situations, such as agricultural and native prairies and forested situations, suggest this is true, but we lack studies for stormwater practices. | #We aren't sure. Studies in other situations, such as agricultural and native prairies and forested situations, suggest this is true, but we lack studies for stormwater practices. |
Answers below
Answers
Answers below
Answers
Answers below
Answers
Answers below
Answers
Answers