m |
m |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Infiltration [[Glossary#B|Best Management Practices]] (BMPs) are susceptible to clogging from the trash, debris, and suspended sediments present in runoff. [[Pre-treatment|Pretreatment]] can remove debris and coarser sediments in an easier-to-maintain pretreatment device that will extend the life and reduce maintenance for the infiltration BMP. | Infiltration [[Glossary#B|Best Management Practices]] (BMPs) are susceptible to clogging from the trash, debris, and suspended sediments present in runoff. [[Pre-treatment|Pretreatment]] can remove debris and coarser sediments in an easier-to-maintain pretreatment device that will extend the life and reduce maintenance for the infiltration BMP. | ||
− | If work is being done under | + | If work is being done under the [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_stormwater_permit MPCA General Stormwater Permit] for construction activity (MNR100001), commonly called the Construction General Permit (CGP), then it is REQUIRED that some form of pretreatment be installed upstream of an infiltration BMP. In all other cases pretreatment is highly recommended. |
− | {{alert|The [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/III._STORMWATER_DISCHARGE_DESIGN_REQUIREMENTS#III.D._PERMANENT_STORMWATER_MANAGEMENT_SYSTEM | + | {{alert|The [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/III._STORMWATER_DISCHARGE_DESIGN_REQUIREMENTS#III.D._PERMANENT_STORMWATER_MANAGEMENT_SYSTEM CGP] states:To prevent clogging of the infiltration or filtration system, the Permittee(s) must use a pretreatment device such as a vegetated filter strip, small sedimentation basin, or water quality inlet (e.g., grit chamber) to settle particulates before the stormwater discharges into the infiltration or filtration system.|alert-danger}} |
{{alert|Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the MPCA.|alert-info}} | {{alert|Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, service mark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the MPCA.|alert-info}} | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''High density urban areas'''. High density urban areas have increased impervious surface and are more likely to contain high concentrations and annual loads of trash, sediments, and pollutants in stormwater runoff. Of particular concern are trash, debris, sediments, metals, organics, and chlorides. | *'''High density urban areas'''. High density urban areas have increased impervious surface and are more likely to contain high concentrations and annual loads of trash, sediments, and pollutants in stormwater runoff. Of particular concern are trash, debris, sediments, metals, organics, and chlorides. | ||
*'''Areas with high potential for erosion'''. Areas that are susceptible to erosion are of concern because of high sediment loads that reduce the BMP’s infiltration capacity as a result of clogging. | *'''Areas with high potential for erosion'''. Areas that are susceptible to erosion are of concern because of high sediment loads that reduce the BMP’s infiltration capacity as a result of clogging. | ||
− | *'''Areas where stormwater has a high pollutant load'''. Areas with a high pollutant load, or the presence of certain pollutants that are not easily removed from runoff are a concern because they have the potential to contaminate the groundwater. | + | *'''Areas where stormwater has a high pollutant load'''. Areas with a high pollutant load, or the presence of certain pollutants that are not easily removed from runoff are a concern because they have the potential to contaminate the groundwater. See the section on [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Potential_stormwater_hotspots potential stormwater hotspots]. |
*'''Storm sewers that convey runoff at a high velocity'''. A high velocity will keep sediment in suspension. Pretreatment should be installed to facilitate the proper settling of the sediment, which will prevent clogging. In addition, high velocities can reduce the volume of runoff that can be infiltrated. | *'''Storm sewers that convey runoff at a high velocity'''. A high velocity will keep sediment in suspension. Pretreatment should be installed to facilitate the proper settling of the sediment, which will prevent clogging. In addition, high velocities can reduce the volume of runoff that can be infiltrated. | ||
Infiltration Best Management Practices (BMPs) are susceptible to clogging from the trash, debris, and suspended sediments present in runoff. Pretreatment can remove debris and coarser sediments in an easier-to-maintain pretreatment device that will extend the life and reduce maintenance for the infiltration BMP. If work is being done under the MPCA General Stormwater Permit for construction activity (MNR100001), commonly called the Construction General Permit (CGP), then it is REQUIRED that some form of pretreatment be installed upstream of an infiltration BMP. In all other cases pretreatment is highly recommended.
Pretreatment is of particular importance in the following situations.
Forebays (small sediment basins) are the most common pretreatment method, though there are many others, including cisterns, drain inlet inserts, oil/water separators, proprietary settling/swirl chambers, and vegetated filter strips. It is important to note that many of these pretreatment techniques will require routine maintenance. Other practices typically considered to be primary BMPs, such as swales and green roofs, are often used for pretreatment.
The following table provides a summary of unit processes for pretreatment BMP.
Unit processes of stormwater pretreatment techniques (Adapted from WEF, 2008)
Link to this table
Control | Vegetated filter strips | Vegetated swale | Forebays | Street/parking lot sweeping | Proprietary settling/swirl chambers | Oil/water separators | Green roofs | Cisterns | Drain inlet inserts |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peak flow attenuation | X | X | |||||||
Infiltration | X | X | |||||||
Dispersion | X | X | X | ||||||
Evapotranspiration | X | ||||||||
Runoff collection and usage | X | ||||||||
Sedimentation | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||
Flotation | X | X | X | ||||||
Laminar separation | X | ||||||||
Swirl concentration | X | ||||||||
Sorption | X | ||||||||
Filtration | X | X | X | ||||||
Plant metabolism | X | X | X | ||||||
Temperature reduction | X | X | X |
Mohamed, Lucke, and Boogaard, 2013. The authors looked at the potential to increase the effective life of permeable pavement systems by first routing the runoff through a swale. The study took place in Australia with the objective of determining the variation in pollutant removal performance along the length of the swale. The experiment showed that the grassed swales studied were effective at removing the sediment from the runoff, and would thus slow down the rate at which the permeable pavement would become clogged. The authors concluded that excessively long swales are not a cost effective solution because most of the removal happens in the first 10 meters. They also concluded that removal of 50 percent of the TSS would significantly increase the life span of the permeable pavements.
Browne, Deletic, Fletcher, and Mudd, 2011. The authors developed a dynamic two dimensional variably saturated flow model that allows a user to represent the storage and clogging of an infiltration trench. The authors modeled the hydrologic effectiveness of infiltration trenches and infiltration basins with no clogging, clogging for 10 years, and clogging for 50 years. The BMPs were modeled in sandy loam and sandy clay. The results showed that there was a significant decrease in the hydrologic effectiveness of the BMPs in sandy loam after 10 years of clogging, and another decrease after 50 years of clogging. With the BMPs in the sandy clay, there was no noticeable decrease after 10 years of clogging, but there was a decrease after 50 years. The results of this experiment show that pretreatment can increase the lifespan of an infiltration BMP.
Maniquiz et al., 2010 conducted research on the effectiveness of presettling basins as a component of stormwater best management practice (BMP) technologies. The authors state "optimizing the design of the presettling basin means that the storage volume ratio should be determined based on the desired captured amount of runoff and sediment from runoff to limit the frequency of maintenance caused by the accumulation of sediment. It was recommended that pretreatment of runoff should be employed when the site in which the BMP is to be sited has high TSS loading and runoff rate, and is subjected to high intensity rainfall."