• *Cantor, S. L. 2008. ''Green Roofs in Sustainable Landscape Design''. W.W.Norton, NY. *Fassman, E. and Simcock, R. 2012. ''Moisture Measurements as Performance Criteria for Extensive Living Roof Substrates''. J. Environ. Eng., 138(8), 841–851
    12 KB (1,711 words) - 02:47, 25 February 2023
  • *[[Design criteria for stormwater and rainwater harvest and use/reuse]]
    5 KB (771 words) - 15:42, 5 December 2022
  • This page provides a discussion of design elements and design steps for dry swales, which are often called grass swales. The following di ...ortant tool for retention and detention of stormwater runoff. Depending on design and construction, swales may provide additional benefits, including cleaner
    43 KB (6,506 words) - 16:08, 29 December 2022
  • ==Design Phase O&M Considerations== ...esigns should mimic natural wetlands and introduce few complex components. Design phase O&M considerations include:
    16 KB (2,272 words) - 18:52, 3 December 2022
  • [[File:mids logo.jpg|300px|right|thumb|alt=image of Minimal Impact Design Standards logo]] .../stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=MIDS_calculator Minimal Impact Design Standards calculator] is a moderately simple tool for estimating pollutant
    18 KB (2,675 words) - 23:33, 5 December 2022
  • ...verage bottom width of the swale main channel. Units are in feet. Based on design restrictions, the bottom width cannot be less than 2 feet. ...length rather than break the swale into separate smaller lengths. Based on design restrictions, the channel slope cannot be less than 0.5 percent or greater
    31 KB (4,982 words) - 13:36, 29 January 2023
  • ...ttp://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Category:Design_criteria design criteria] and recommendations from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual will be followed. ...00 gallons, each. The following summarizes the performance of the revised design.
    31 KB (4,411 words) - 13:21, 12 February 2023
  • *The user is asked to select a design level from a dropdown. [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title= For the sand filter BMP, BMP watershed areas is the only required design parameter.
    15 KB (2,395 words) - 01:30, 23 December 2022
  • ...Risk Limits, Health Based Values, or Maximum Contaminant Levels) and soil criteria (Soil Leaching Values). Note that in addition to having high contaminant le For more information on these risk criteria and determining if high contaminant levels exist at a site, see the followi
    31 KB (4,546 words) - 14:23, 11 February 2023
  • ...a descriptions of different types of infiltration practices to which these design guidelines apply, [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=BMPs_ ...ortant tool for retention and detention of stormwater runoff. Depending on design and construction, infiltration practices may provide additional benefits, i
    62 KB (9,180 words) - 18:45, 29 December 2022
  • *[[Design criteria for infiltration]]
    7 KB (996 words) - 15:32, 27 December 2022
  • ...erent components of a green roof. Thicknesses of some layers vary with the design (e.g. extensive vs. intensive roofs).</font size>]] ...s Minnesota. Note the vegetation free zones. Image Courtesy of The Kestrel Design Group, Inc.</font size>]]
    20 KB (2,983 words) - 21:34, 7 February 2023
  • ...als_for_new_development,_re-development_and_linear_projects Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) performance goal]. Once complete, the site is meant to be ...ttp://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Category:Design_criteria design criteria] and recommendations from the Minnesota Stormwater Manual will be followed.
    38 KB (5,550 words) - 13:29, 12 February 2023
  • *Design Features: Wet swale, two-stage design, grade control/rock checks, vane weirs, vegetation restoration ...ement water quality and flood reduction improvements. The Carpenter Creek Design Build Project achieved multiple benefits including flood reduction, floodpl
    27 KB (3,916 words) - 20:08, 12 December 2022
  • ...watershed organizations (see for example, [[References for Unified Sizing Criteria|WCWC, 2003 and EOR, 2000]]), there is a great deal of potential for overlap In addition to the eight specific [[Summary of suggested stormwater criteria for MN receiving waters|“special waters”]] mentioned in the state CGP,
    45 KB (6,677 words) - 13:36, 6 January 2023
  • ...iency || <font size=4><center>&#9684;</center></font size> || Depending on design, may provide energy and water savings. ...lly microscale, but multiple practices, when incorporated into a landscape design, can provide macroscale benefits.
    22 KB (2,986 words) - 18:16, 5 December 2022
  • ...f required submittals, and required testing, such as, for example [[Design criteria for bioretention#Determine site infiltration rates (for facilities with inf ...g guidelines and specifications apply specifically to trees for stormwater design.
    24 KB (3,593 words) - 16:11, 9 February 2023
  • ..., C, or D) for the user. Once a soil type is selected, the corresponding [[Design infiltration rates|infiltration rate]] will populate in the ''Infiltration *The infiltration basin has been properly [[Design criteria for Infiltration basin|designed]], [[Construction specifications for Infilt
    22 KB (3,347 words) - 13:33, 29 January 2023
  • *BSD - better site design *MIDS- Minimal Impact Design Standards
    5 KB (841 words) - 17:14, 20 July 2022
  • ...dex.php/Design_criteria_for_stormwater_and_rainwater_harvest_and_use/reuse Design Guidance], [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Construction_specif ...are outlined in the Design Guidance and Calculators section. Water quality criteria for different beneficial uses of stormwater are discussed in more detail [[
    37 KB (5,490 words) - 12:41, 14 February 2023

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)