image

The Minnesota Stormwater General Construction Permit requires that the first 1-inch of stormwater runoff be managed on site for development projects that add 1-acre or more of impervious surface. The most common approach is to infiltrate the runoff through a bioinfiltration basin or similar Best Management Practice (BMP). However the installation of infiltration BMPs at Brownfields, Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST), and other environmentally impacted commercial and industrial sites is not allowed where the infiltrated runoff could come into contact with and mobilize contaminants in soil or groundwater. The following case studies describe redevelopment projects where infiltration systems were successfully installed at sites where contaminated soils or groundwater existed. The two most common approaches include siting the infiltration system in an area of clean soils, or fully removing all contaminated soils in and around the infiltration device. In all cases, additional testing of the soils in the infiltration area was conducted before construction, permissions were given by the MPCA, and construction field screening was performed to confirm that the infiltration site was clear of contaminants.

CVS Pharmacy – West Division Street and 25th Avenue South, St. Cloud

schematic for CVS site
Map showing location of CVS site.
photo of CVS site
Photo of bioretention system at CVS site. Image from Google Maps/Google Earth.

CVS Pharmacy opened a new store located at the intersection of West Division Street and 25th Avenue South in St. Cloud. The project combined five small parcels previously occupied by two restaurants, two residences, and an auto repair and parts store. Site plans developed for the project included construction of the new CVS building, relocation of one of the restaurants to the southerly portion of the site, and construction of parking for both buildings. The plans proposed four stormwater infiltration BMPs be installed, three of which as surface infiltration basins and the fourth as an underground StormTech infiltration vault.

Soil contamination concerns focused on the auto repair parcel, which previously had contained a fueling area. In 2001, the fueling area had a known leaking underground storage tank. Investigations concluded that contamination was limited to the areas surrounding the underground tanks. Remediation of the soils was completed under the MPCA LUST program. It was determined that the contaminants had not migrated off-site. The LUST program approved a site closure recommendation in 2003.

A Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the CVS Pharmacy was performed in 2011. Soil samples from the fueling area parcel were analyzed for contaminants of concern, including Gasoline Range Organics (GROs), Diesel Range Organics (DROs), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), and Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). All geotechnical borings were field screened for the presence of organic contaminants. Samples with high field readings were sent to the laboratory for analysis.

A Development Response Action Plan was prepared in 2012 which recommended that the fill below the CVS building be removed and properly disposed or reused on site. Three pollutant hotspots found to contain elevated levels of lead and arsenic were also to be fully excavated and the soils disposed. Any contaminated materials found during utility excavation or general site grading were also to be removed and properly disposed. As a condition of approval of the Development Response Action Plan, the MPCA stipulated that the soils below the stormwater infiltration basin located within the auto repair parcel could not exceed MPCAs Soil Leaching Values (SLVs) for the contaminants of concern.

Issue

Soil investigations were not conducted at specific locations proposed for stormwater infiltration.

Stormwater

A review of the Phase II investigation that was conducted while the infiltration system was in design found that there were no borings or samples conducted at the exact location of the stormwater BMPs. Concerns were raised by the City of St. Cloud and the MPCA stormwater group, who requested additional soil samples for all of the infiltration BMP locations to ensure that the infiltrated runoff would not come into contact with any contaminated soils. Three test pits were dug at each of the four infiltration areas and samples of soils tested for the contaminants of concern. Low levels of RCRA metals were discovered n the samples, all of which were below MPCA standards for SLVs and Soil Reference Values (SRVs) except for one. Selenium was found in higher concentrations at one of the infiltration sites. To facilitate infiltration, all of the soil below the infiltration BMPs were excavated to a depth where the native granular material was found. The excavated areas were backfilled with clean granular material. Much of the excavated materials was reused on site. Excavated soils that were determined to be unsuitable for reuse were properly disposed.

The project was completed in 2013.

Source

MPCA Brownfield file for project VP28540.

Lunds, 1201 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis

schematic Lunds site
Map showing location of Lund's site.

Lunds opened a grocery store in 2012 on what was a brownfield site in downtown Minneapolis. Originally the parcels at this site contained residential structures constructed in the 1880s. Residential uses continued until the first commercial buildings were constructed in the 1920s. The commercial operations since that time included an auto dealership and an electrical parts supplier. Additionally, a dry cleaner was also once operating adjacent to the site.

Environmental investigations began in 2003. It was suspected that there was potential petroleum and/or hazardous materials contamination from the historic operations of the automotive facility and adjacent dry cleaning facility. There was also documentation of known contamination of upgradient groundwater from a separate site. Phase I and subsequent investigations concluded that both petroleum and non-petroleum contaminants were present:

  • Soil borings revealed pockets of construction debris in the upper layers of fill, including concrete debris plus trace levels of ash, coal, and brick.
  • Soil samples detected PAHs, RCRA metals, and VOCs in the fill soils and buried debris.
  • Two areas of concern contained PAHs concentrations in excess of the SRV for industrial land use, focused in the central areas of the site.

The soil borings showed that the fill material on the site consisted primarily of silty sand embedded with layers of silt. No groundwater was found to the boring depths of 25 feet.

Issue

Contamination discovered at location of proposed infiltration basin.

Stormwater Management

Lunds had established a goal of meeting LEED requirements, which included stormwater management goals that fully manages the runoff from a 1.25-inch rainfall, amounting to 4,138 cubic feet of runoff volume. Features of the stormwater facilities include:

The raingarden and infiltration dry wells were located in areas of the site that were not identified as having significant contamination. As a confirmation, four borings were conducted in the location of the raingarden and one at each proposed dry infiltration well. No contaminants were found at the dry infiltration well locations. At the rain garden, low concentrations of VOCs, PAHs, RCRA metals, DRO, and GRO were discovered. As a result, the raingarden was installed with an impervious liner to prevent infiltration into the contaminated soils. An underdrain collection system was installed that collects the filtered runoff which is then discharged to one of the dry infiltration wells.

The infiltration wells are surrounded by coarse aggregate to a depth of 12 feet below the surface elevation. Two of the wells are connected with 1-foot diameter perforated pipe for additional infiltration capacity. It was determined that the infiltration sump structures met the definition of an injection well per the USEPA Class V Injection Control Program. The wells were registered with the USEPA prior to construction of the infiltration system. Field screening was performed during excavation in accordance with MPCA requirements. Soils in the two areas identified with excessive contamination were removed and disposed in a landfill. Clean soils were imported as fill and capped within the bituminous parking lot.

The completed project manages a stormwater volume in excess of the 1.25-inch goal, managing 5,123 cubic feet of stormwater volume. Building and site improvements were able to achieve a Silver LEED certification. LEED points were granted for brownfield redevelopment, stormwater quality control, and stormwater quantity control.

Additional Information

Source

MPCA Brownfield file for project VP19242.

Open Arms of Minnesota – 2500 Bloomington Avenue South, Minneapolis

schematic of Open Arms site
Map showing location of Open Arms site

Open Arms is a non-profit organization that cooks and delivers meals free-of-charge to people suffering from chronic illness. In 2007, Open Arms purchased eight parcels in a residential/commercial neighborhood of Minneapolis for the purpose of constructing a new building to house their kitchens, offices, and storage, plus a parking lot large enough to accommodate volunteer parking and the loading/unloading of supplies.

The 0.8 acre site has been developed since the late 1800s. The three north-eastern most parcels were commercial operations, while the remaining parcels contained single family residential houses. Records show that the commercial operations included a machine shop, auto repair shop and a sign painting shop. Environmental investigations conducted in 2006 through 2008 determined that three of the eight parcels contained contaminated soils:

  • PAHs, selenium, arsenic and lead were found in the soil as a result of a recorded release from the sign painting operation. Soil tests found the concentrations of these contaminants above the industrial SRVs. Selenium concentrations were found to be above the MPCA SLVs.
  • The site is within the USEPA’s designated “South Minneapolis Residential Contamination Site” which is on the National Priorities List. This contamination is a result of a former pesticide manufacturer site that is approximately ½ mile from the Open Arms property. High concentrations of arsenic were used in the pesticide, some of which may have become airborne and deposited on nearby properties. Two of the parcels were found to have arsenic in the shallow soils where there once was front yards for the residential parcels.

A soil management plan was developed that focused on the areas disturbed during construction, including the building foundation, utilities, and general site grading. Soil was excavated and replaced to a depth of 2-feet below the impervious surfaces and to a depth of 4-feet below the green spaces. Monitoring during excavation was conducted to determine if there were contaminated soils discovered.

Issue

Stormwater infiltration BMP proposed after completion of Phase II environmental site investigations and MPCA approval of the Response Action Plan.

Stormwater Management

The City’s Zoning Code required that parking areas should be designed with wheel stops in lieu of curbing to encourage infiltration of runoff. There was a concern that the runoff from the parking areas would flow to neighboring residential properties. Therefore, the Conditional Use Permit issued by the City allowed continuous curbing, but included a statement that encouraged onsite retention and filtration of the parking lot runoff. Designers proposed that the runoff from the parking lot and rooftop be collected into a 72-inch diameter perforated pipe, 95-feet in length. Runoff that is contained in the pipe is designed to infiltrate through stone bedding into the subsoil. Excess runoff discharges to the City storm sewer system.

A supplemental round of sampling was conducted after it was determined that the stormwater management proposal was to install a below ground infiltration system. The supplemental sampling was to assure that the infiltrated runoff did not migrate into any contaminated soils. Three soil samples were collected from below the invert of the underground infiltration tank. Three test pits were excavated and samples were collected to a depth of 10 feet below the surface. Contaminants were not found in the samples, nor DRO or PAH levels above the laboratory reporting limits. RCRA metals were found to be within the range naturally found in the soils in the area. Additional observations during excavation found no evidence of contaminated soils.

The project was funded in part by a remediation grant from the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund in 2008. The project was completed in 2010.

Additional Information

Source

MPCA Brownfield file for project VP23670.

Beacon Bluff Redevelopment (3M Company Parcel 5) – 949 Wells Street, St. Paul

photos of Beacon Bluff site
Photos from the Beacon Bluff site. Image: St. Paul Historical

In 2008 and 2009, the St. Paul Port Authority (SPPA) purchased nine parcels of property from the 3M Company (3M) located along Minnehaha Avenue and East 7th Street in St. Paul. The 46-acre site is the original campus for 3M, operating from 1910 through 1962. The SPPA obtained the properties for the purpose of preparing the site for redevelopment, with a long-term vision of green redevelopment and environmentally sustainable businesses. Parcel 5, the northern-most parcel, is nearly 16 acres in size. The parcel included a lumber company and an iron company before being obtained by 3M. 3M used the parcel as a machine shop, fabrication area, and for bulk petroleum storage. Environmental investigations discovered contaminated fill in five areas of the parcel. The contamination was found in the soils to depths of 12 feet. Contaminants included RCRA metals, DROs, PAHs, and VOCs. PAHs, lead, arsenic, and iron concentrations exceeded Tier II SRV standards for industrial use. DROs exceeded MPCA standards. Low levels of VOCs and metals were found in the groundwater, with arsenic exceeding state standards.

Issue

Contamination hotspot discovered at location proposed for regional stormwater infiltration basin.

Stormwater Management

SPPA initiated a project in 2010 to clean-up and prepare Parcel 5 for redevelopment. The project involved building demolition, removal/disposal of contaminated soils at the five identified hot-spots, upgrade of utilities, construction of a new street, and construction of a stormwater infiltration system. It was determined that the stormwater system could be a regional system, with capacity to treat runoff from an upstream 163-acre residential area in addition to the runoff from the redevelopment site. Runoff from the area, including both the redevelopment area and the upstream residential area, drains to the Mississippi River via the Phalen Creek storm tunnel, which is located in the adjacent Phalen Parkway.

The infiltration basins were located in one of the five identified hot-spots. A Response Action Implementation Plan included a proposal to excavate below the infiltration chambers to reach soils favorable for infiltration. During construction, the excavation area for the infiltration system was expanded beyond the limits of the identified hot spot to remove a layer of ash and debris that was discovered during excavation. The final result was excavation below the entire footprint of the infiltration basins/chambers and replacement with soils favorable to the infiltration system.

The primary features of the stormwater system include sump manholes with SAFL Baffles, two above ground infiltration basins, and 650-feet of below ground 10-foot diameter infiltration chambers. The primary infiltration basin is a bioinfiltration design consisting of engineered soil media and native vegetation plantings. The infiltration chambers are installed directly below one of the infiltration basins. The chambers infiltrate through a washed aggregate bed to the native soils below. A layer of recycled tire chips is installed between the bottom of the infiltration basin and the top of the infiltration chambers is to create additional subsurface void space for volume storage. The area surrounding the infiltration basins was further improved as a stormwater demonstration project, including a stone-lined drainage channel, pervious pavers in the pathways, educational signage, and public art.

The completed project has won a number of awards, including:

  • 2011 Environmental Community Partner Award from GreatRiver Greening
  • 2011 Environmental Excellence Award from National Demolition Association
  • 2011 Seven Wonders of Engineering Award from the Minnesota Society of Professional Engineers
  • 2011 Sustainable Communities Award from Minnesota Environmental Initiative
  • 2012 Engineering Excellence Award from Minnesota American Council of Engineering Companies

Additional Information

Sources

Green Line LRT – University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

schematic of Green Line site
Map illustrating Green Line site.

The Green Line Light Rail Transit (LRT), also called the Central Corridor LRT, began operation between downtown Minneapolis and downtown St. Paul in 2012. The segment of the project that is highlighted in this case study is called the Civil West Construction Segment. Specifically, this segment is the portion of the route in Minneapolis that passes through the University of Minnesota and a historically industrial area between the University of Minnesota and St. Paul. Extensive environmental investigations were conducted along the route and multiple areas of contamination were identified that were remediated during construction. The most common pollutants included DROs, GROs, petroleum related VOCs, PAHs, metals, and debris. Subsurface construction, including utility construction and soil corrections/removals was conducted in 2010 and 2011. Soils were monitored during excavation and were field screened to ensure all contaminated soils were removed and properly disposed.

Issue

Stormwater infiltration proposed for parcels adjacent to known contamination sites.

Stormwater Management

A stormwater advisory team and the watershed organizations responsible for approval of stormwater management plans advocated for infiltration of stormwater runoff. However the highly developed nature of the area plus the presence of contaminated soils in the Civil West Segment limited the areas that were suitable for stormwater infiltration. An infiltration concept was developed that proposed a length of perforated pipe below sidewalks. Boulevard trees were proposed above the perforated pipes. This concept was proposed for three infiltration areas:

  • Area 2-1. Washington Avenue at Union Street Southeast. Phase II investigations did not show contamination at this location. Stormwater management features proposed included a 12-inch diameter perforated pipe, 200-feet in length below the sidewalk at a depth of 4.5-feet in a V-shaped trench. The trench would be backfilled with clean soils and planted with trees. No debris, odors, staining or other signs of contamination were found during excavation, however wood tie debris and asbestos containing materials were discovered on a parcel immediately adjacent to the infiltration trench. These soils were excavated and disposed off-site. The infiltration system was installed as proposed.
  • Area 2-2. Washington Avenue at Walnut Street Southeast. Phase II investigations found traces of concrete at this location. Stormwater management features proposed included a 12-inch diameter perforated pipe, 300-feet in length below the sidewalk at a depth of 4.5-feet in a V-shaped trench. The trench would be backfilled with clean soils and planted with trees. MPCA would not approve this proposal based on their concern that the infiltrated runoff would come into contact with known groundwater contamination on an adjacent property. This denial created a conflict with the stormwater infiltration requirements of the watershed organizations. MPCA determined that infiltration could be approved if the following conditions were met:
  1. The watershed organization approves the infiltration system.
  2. Installation of a minimum of three groundwater wells to determine the direction of groundwater flow and to collect samples.
  3. The owner of the stormwater system must assume responsibility for the infiltration system.
The Metropolitan Council, as owner of the LRT system, was not willing to accept these conditions and the infiltration system on Washington Avenue at Walnut Street was not installed. During construction a minor quantity of concrete debris was encountered, representing approximately 1% of the excavated volume. No additional signs of contamination were found. The soils were excavated and disposed off-site. The infiltration system was installed as proposed.
  • Area 2-4. Huron Triangle at the Intersection of University Avenue Southeast, Huron Boulevard, and Washington Avenue. Phase II investigations found that the groundwater below this parcel was contaminated with tetrachloroethylene (PCE), trichloroethylene (TCE), DROs, and GROs. Due to this contamination, it was determined that stormwater infiltration was not appropriate. Preliminary designs were developed for a stormwater filtration system. Runoff would filter through media, which would be collected in 4-inch underdrains that discharge to an underground storage vault. The vault would temporarily store the runoff before discharge to a nearby storm sewer. A clay liner would be installed to restrict infiltration. The filtration system was installed as proposed.

Additional Information

Source

  • MPCA Brownfield file for project PBP3796.

This page was last edited on 9 September 2019, at 13:29.

Template:Footer