Search results
Create the page "Design specifications for stormwater ponds" on this wiki! See also the search results found.
- #REDIRECT [[Design criteria for infiltration]] The following terminology is used throughout this Design Section:33 KB (4,796 words) - 18:43, 29 December 2022
- ...costs. Barr identified a range of typical construction and operating costs for eight1 ...en they occurred. A major element of this effort was to normalize the data for 2010 Minnesota costs.36 KB (5,524 words) - 14:44, 8 December 2022
- ...e mesh that are processed into three dimensional reinforcement matrices, a design that serves permanent and critical applications where site conditions excee ...TRMs are used to provide temporary cover for bare soil, long-term support for vegetation, and permanent armoring against shear stress caused by flowing w24 KB (3,596 words) - 18:00, 11 January 2023
- ...es should not be used for check dam applications, as they are not intended for concentrated flow areas. ...infiltration is an added benefit. Check dams are not a suitable substitute for major perimeter sediment trapping measures and can be easily washed away b28 KB (4,232 words) - 14:27, 14 February 2023
- {{alert|Stormwater and rainwater harvest and use systems can improve or maintain watershed hyd ...nes apply. In Minnesota, please contact the Minnesota Department of Health for questions related to harvest and use of greywater or blackwater.37 KB (5,490 words) - 12:41, 14 February 2023
- ...al_by_BMPs#References Sources]. NOTE: removal efficiencies are 100 percent for water that is infiltrated.<br> ...cteria; <sup>4</sup> From the International Stormwater BMP database, 2016, for total nitrogen; <sup>5</sup> No data found.</font size>36 KB (5,160 words) - 22:22, 23 November 2022
- ...nded pollutant removal efficiencies, in percent, for sand filters. [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Information_on_pollutant_removal_by_BMPs#Referenc [[File:Pdf image.png|100px|thumb|left|alt=pdf image|<font size=3>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=File:Calculating_credits_for_sand_filter_-_51 KB (7,365 words) - 20:08, 22 November 2022
- ...nded pollutant removal efficiencies, in percent, for sand filters. [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Information_on_pollutant_removal_by_BMPs#Referenc [[File:Pdf image.png|100px|thumb|left|alt=pdf image|<font size=3>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=File:Calculating_credits_for_sand_filter_-_51 KB (7,398 words) - 14:29, 2 February 2023
- #REDIRECT [[Design criteria for infiltration]] The following terminology is used throughout this Design Section:40 KB (5,955 words) - 18:11, 29 December 2022
- #REDIRECT [[Calculating credits for infiltration]] ...pollutant removal efficiencies, in percent, for infiltration BMPs. [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Information_on_pollutant_removal_by_BMPs#Referenc37 KB (5,249 words) - 16:07, 18 July 2022
- ...sed conveyance efficiency of curbs, gutters and storm drains ([[References for Unified Sizing Criteria|CWP, 2003 and 2004]]). ...2 years, with approximately 1.5 years as the most prevalent ([[References for Unified Sizing Criteria|Leopold, 1964 and 1994]]), and maintaining this dis41 KB (6,386 words) - 19:17, 6 December 2022
- ...pollutant removal efficiencies, in percent, for infiltration BMPs. [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Information_on_pollutant_removal_by_BMPs#Referenc | colspan="8" style="text-align: center;" |Pollutant removal is 100 percent for the volume that is captured and infiltrated. If captured water is routed to45 KB (6,471 words) - 21:16, 28 July 2022
- ...etention practices can be an important tool for retention and detention of stormwater runoff. Because they utilize vegetation, bioretention practices provide add [[File:Pdf image.png|100px|thumb|alt=pdf image|<font size=3>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=File:Operation_and_maintenance_of_bioretent24 KB (3,487 words) - 22:28, 31 January 2023
- [[File:Pdf image.png|100px|thumb|left|alt=pdf image|<font size=3>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=File:Design_criteria_for_infiltration_-_Min ...of infiltration practices to which these design guidelines apply, [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=BMPs_for_stormwater_infiltration link here]62 KB (9,180 words) - 18:45, 29 December 2022
- ...f soil, slope, temperature, and rainfall conditions, they are not intended for use in concentrated flow locations, such as ditches and channels. ...turbing activities such as clearing, grading, or cut/fill work has stopped for a period of time. Bare areas that are not actively being worked need some t27 KB (3,971 words) - 18:08, 11 January 2023
- ...tegory, and they are discussed in more detail in the [[Types of stormwater ponds|Manual]]. ...d bug, when viewing a formula in a combined article, the math markup (used for equations) is displayed. Please ignore the markup. Thanks.76 KB (11,526 words) - 21:29, 9 December 2022
- ...pollutant removal efficiencies, in percent, for infiltration BMPs. [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Information_on_pollutant_removal_by_BMPs#Referenc | colspan="8" style="text-align: center;" |Pollutant removal is 100 percent for the volume that is captured and infiltrated42 KB (5,899 words) - 14:22, 26 July 2022
- ...an be more area designated and managed for specially protected waters than for regular ones. ...s do not. The material in this section is offered as guidance when further stormwater management is deemed necessary or desirable by state or local decision make45 KB (6,677 words) - 13:36, 6 January 2023
- *[[Operation and maintenance of bioretention and other stormwater infiltration practices]] *[[Operation and maintenance of bioretention and other stormwater infiltration practices - supplemental information]]34 KB (4,859 words) - 22:08, 24 January 2023
- {{alert|Trees can be an important tool for retention and detention of stormwater runoff. Trees provide additional benefits, including cleaner air, reduction <font size=4>[[Street sweeping|'''See this page for information on street sweeping''']]</font size>22 KB (3,194 words) - 18:47, 20 February 2023
- ...ces Sources]. NOTE: removal efficiencies are 100 percent of captured water for systems with no underdrain'''.<br> [[File:Pdf image.png|100px|left|thumb|alt=pdf image|<font size=3>[https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=File:Calculating_credits_for_permeable_pave58 KB (8,708 words) - 02:30, 15 December 2022
- ...al_by_BMPs#References Sources]. NOTE: removal efficiencies are 100 percent for water that is infiltrated.<br> | [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Phosphorus_credits_for_bioretention_systems_with_65 KB (9,893 words) - 13:52, 29 December 2022
- ...maintained for the purpose of providing temporary storage or treatment of stormwater. ...ut eventually <span title="The length of time or amount of dosing required for concentrations in effluent passing through a media to equal or exceed conce47 KB (7,005 words) - 23:00, 5 January 2023
- Quickguides have been created for two of the worksheets in the form. Examples showing how to complete the form are contained in another [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Examples_for_completing_the_TMDL_reporting_form g50 KB (7,798 words) - 21:24, 4 January 2023
- ...al_by_BMPs#References Sources]. NOTE: removal efficiencies are 100 percent for water that is infiltrated.<br> | [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Phosphorus_credits_for_bioretention_systems_with_70 KB (10,269 words) - 20:36, 17 November 2022
- {{alert|Stormwater and rainwater harvest and use systems can improve or maintain watershed hyd ..., and water quality recommendations and/or regulations. The design process for each project must be flexible and rigorous enough to address these factors.113 KB (16,329 words) - 17:02, 29 December 2022
- AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARG Link to the 2013 Construction Stormwater Permit - pdf version [[File:Wq-strm2-68a.pdf|link]]109 KB (17,051 words) - 19:48, 1 December 2022
- ...al_by_BMPs#References Sources]. NOTE: removal efficiencies are 100 percent for water that is infiltrated.<br> | [http://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/Phosphorus_credits_for_bioretention_systems_with_75 KB (11,201 words) - 18:43, 13 December 2022
- ...noff. For more information on this topic, see Chapter 5 of MPCA’s [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Protecting_Water_Quality_in_Urban_Areas:_Be ...ognize that runoff from snowmelt has special characteristics, and that BMP design criteria addressing only rainfall runoff might not work well during cold pe78 KB (12,338 words) - 13:58, 20 February 2023
- '''Comment''': [https://stormwater.pca.state.mn.us/index.php?title=Design_criteria_for_infiltration Regarding ...n's portal for post-construction technical standards rather than standards for a specific BMP.139 KB (19,236 words) - 15:31, 19 July 2023