Interception rate for various tree species
Link to this table
| Tree type | Tree name | Percent interception | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coniferous | Red cedar | 76 | Huang et al (2017) |
| Douglas fir | 69 | Huang et al (2017) | |
| Red cedar | 61 | Asadian & Weiler (2009) | |
| Douglas fir | 49 | Asadian & Weiler (2009) | |
| Black pine | 47 | Zabret & Srag (2019) | |
| White pine | 43 | Hathaway (2019) | |
| Deciduous | White peppermint | 44 | Livesley et al (2013) |
| Gingko | 38 | Xiao & McPherson (2011) | |
| Red maple | 29 | Hathaway (2019) | |
| Willow oak | 29 | Hathaway (2019) | |
| Blue gum | 29 | Livesley et al (2013) | |
| Silver birch | 24 | Zabret & Sraj (2019) | |
| Sweetgum | 14 | Xiao & McPherson (2011) |